Search found 14 matches

by hufflepuff
June 15th, 2026, 8:10 am
Forum: Series I Tuning
Topic: P0335 code
Replies: 50
Views: 461943

Re: P0335 code

You are a legend. I had transcription rounding errors in the first two MAS scaling cells. Reset to OEM and no CEL. Thanks for experimenting and reporting your findings!
by hufflepuff
May 30th, 2026, 5:50 pm
Forum: Series I Tuning
Topic: Versatuner Tutorial - 8 Years of Experience and Lessons Learned!
Replies: 1
Views: 5791

Versatuner Tutorial - 8 Years of Experience and Lessons Learned!

Hey guys, I made a nice tutorial for folks who are newer to creating their own tune files to help alleviate some of the intimidation of tuning yourself. i also just recently experimented around with settings that FINALLY allow me to reliable transition from closed loop to open loop and to tune the A...
by hufflepuff
April 22nd, 2026, 8:47 am
Forum: Series I Tuning
Topic: Can't get 2,000-3,000 rpm range to enrichen!
Replies: 9
Views: 32496

Re: Can't get 2,000-3,000 rpm range to enrichen!

Follow-up: Load limit unknown was indeed screwing my attempts to tune in the 2,000-5,000 rpm range. i changed my load limit unknown values to around 0.65 - 0.75 as rpms increase between 2,000 and 5,490, and now it is easy to enter open loop and rely upon the air fuel ratio tables for tuning. If you ...
by hufflepuff
April 10th, 2026, 8:58 am
Forum: Series I Tuning
Topic: Performance Tune Update
Replies: 8
Views: 16789

Re: Performance Tune Update

Do your tunes fix the lean OE fueling from 2,000-5,000 rpms? I've tried everything on my tunes to fix the car running so lean in that RPM range but nothing seems to work. it seems like the car is still trying to run in closed loop below 5,000 rpms.
by hufflepuff
April 6th, 2026, 5:04 pm
Forum: Series I Tuning
Topic: Can't get 2,000-3,000 rpm range to enrichen!
Replies: 9
Views: 32496

Re: Can't get 2,000-3,000 rpm range to enrichen!

i'm going to try enrichening the acceleration enrichment tables - i know VT says that the ECU uses the lowest value between enrichment and air fuel tables, but i suspect these tables might've been causing the car to run quite lean up until ~5,000 rpms as other rx8 owners have noted.
accel enrich.PNG
accel enrich.PNG (14.45 KiB) Viewed 31935 times
by hufflepuff
March 30th, 2026, 7:20 am
Forum: Series I Tuning
Topic: Can't get 2,000-3,000 rpm range to enrichen!
Replies: 9
Views: 32496

Re: Can't get 2,000-3,000 rpm range to enrichen!

There is another table that is maximum load limits for closed loop... those were set quite high in the lower RPM ranges, seems like a promising option to explore. will report back!
by hufflepuff
March 29th, 2026, 5:01 pm
Forum: Series I Tuning
Topic: Can't get 2,000-3,000 rpm range to enrichen!
Replies: 9
Views: 32496

Re: Can't get 2,000-3,000 rpm range to enrichen!

Do you all think load limit unknown might be playing some time-dependent role in fueling below 6,000 rpms?
...
...
LL unk.PNG
LL unk.PNG (23.67 KiB) Viewed 32193 times
by hufflepuff
March 27th, 2026, 8:26 pm
Forum: Series I Tuning
Topic: Can't get 2,000-3,000 rpm range to enrichen!
Replies: 9
Views: 32496

Re: Can't get 2,000-3,000 rpm range to enrichen!

Apologies for the delayed response. sure, i attached four logs that show inconsistent / weird fueling from 2,000 to various RPMs
by hufflepuff
March 21st, 2026, 11:22 am
Forum: Mazda RX-8
Topic: Air Fuel Ratio maps 1,2 and 3
Replies: 15
Views: 38169

Re: Air Fuel Ratio maps 1,2 and 3

FIX: my car was running off the table, i.e. the fuel table went to 9,000 rpms but i was revving to 9,300. i had to rescale the fuel table axes to allow myself to enter a a value for the highest rev range. that allowed me to lean out the 9.000-9,300 range.
by hufflepuff
March 21st, 2026, 11:19 am
Forum: Series I Tuning
Topic: Can't get 2,000-3,000 rpm range to enrichen!
Replies: 9
Views: 32496

Re: Can't get 2,000-3,000 rpm range to enrichen!

Also, all three of the charts below are with the same tune, yet the AFRs between 2,000-5,500 seem to be very inconsistent in terms of enrichment. it honestly looks like sometimes the ECU is trying to target 0.95 lambda, and other times it suddenly drops to the values more consistent with my AFR tabl...