Here is the freeze frame data.

Didn't get freeze frame data yet to post but I will say driving it so far doesn't seem to run 100% correctly after this change to both the upper and lower MAF thresholds.

Changed those values by 10%. Same code returned. I'll get the freeze frame again but when I checked it on a cheap scanner showed 23 g/s MAF value at 2100 rpm.

I see MAF flow delta absolute high and low thresholds which I think is what you are referring to. They are .7936 and -.7936. do you have a recommendation on how far to bump those? .80 and .-80?

I'm not positive but I'd think if the fuel trims were the issue it would be throwing a fuel code. From what I have researched the p0101 can be for 10% variance in expected mass air flow values. Is that correct?

I was able to get the freezeframe from another scanner. VersaTune does not have the ability to see it that I could find.

VersaTune does not have the dtc freeze frame option unfortunately (At least I could locate). I can see if I can log with another tool. I'll get that and post it. Hopefully in the next few days possibly. Thanks again for helping take a look.

Those logs were split from one large one headers should all be the same and line up. This log was taken with the DTC disabled. I can get another log with the light on and dump one here as well if that would help. I agree the throttle body shouldnt have really impacts the MAF

Here is a driving log and the tune file that is on the car. Sorry for such a late response and thanks for taking a look.

Anyone work through rescaling MAF calibration tables to correct a p0101? I installed the Bosch 68mm throttle body and am using the crackle pop tune. Car doesn't seem to really care about the code. I have reflashed the tune disabling the DTC for this code to collect data and started to attempt a resc...