Search found 20 matches
- October 16th, 2015, 8:10 am
- Forum: Mazda 2.3 DISI Turbo
- Topic: APP Requested Load tables: APP or TPS?
- Replies: 1
- Views: 10065
APP Requested Load tables: APP or TPS?
I would like to know if the 3-dim. "APP requested load..." tables in VT really display requested load depending on app (and of course rpm) or with respect to tps (throttle opening angle) as it is in all other known MS tuning software (Cobb AP, MazdaEdit...). Can anyone from the VT team def...
- December 13th, 2014, 11:20 am
- Forum: Software Support
- Topic: Missing features in VersaTuner
- Replies: 27
- Views: 44871
Re: Missing features in VersaTuner
I still miss 2 helpful features:
- possibility to simultaneously log more than just 12 parameters
- possibility to copy a selected range of table values from the comparison tune to the current tune
This shoulddn't be too much effort to implement, but would be really beneficial...
- possibility to simultaneously log more than just 12 parameters
- possibility to copy a selected range of table values from the comparison tune to the current tune
This shoulddn't be too much effort to implement, but would be really beneficial...
- December 7th, 2014, 11:38 am
- Forum: Software Support
- Topic: Missing features in VersaTuner
- Replies: 27
- Views: 44871
Re: Missing features in VersaTuner
Surprisingly there's again a new version (1.9.5) available - congratulations for the very quick/short new release process, even if there may be just a few changes!
- November 3rd, 2014, 5:45 pm
- Forum: Software Support
- Topic: Missing features in VersaTuner
- Replies: 27
- Views: 44871
Re: Missing features in VersaTuner
OK, provided that the periodic update cycle is significantly reduced, this is something I can live with ;-) It's clear that you have to focus on a few distinct features and can't implement all requested features at once - at least not in a "short" time and desirable quality. Maybe it would...
- November 3rd, 2014, 5:24 pm
- Forum: Software Support
- Topic: Missing features in VersaTuner
- Replies: 27
- Views: 44871
Re: Missing features in VersaTuner
I just installed the new release and had a glance on the obvious changes - here's my first impression: - The look and feel / user interface isn't as user friendly as before (the former, yellow background color resulted in a better contrast for reading) - There are no new tables accessible!? At least...
- June 21st, 2014, 4:38 pm
- Forum: Software Support
- Topic: Missing features in VersaTuner
- Replies: 27
- Views: 44871
Re: Missing features in VersaTuner
I know this setting, but as I wrote above this FSG is not sufficient to adjust for an E-mix. There's a second parameter, the fuel scalar, which has to be adjusted, too.mituc wrote:Fueling -> Fuel Specific Gravity.
- June 21st, 2014, 5:19 am
- Forum: Software Support
- Topic: Missing features in VersaTuner
- Replies: 27
- Views: 44871
Re: Missing features in VersaTuner
Since I'm currently tuning for an E85 mix, it would be very helpful to have access to the fuel scalar value (in addition to the FSG parameter)! In my opinion it's really time to launch a new (at least minor) version/release because there are a lot of potential improvements, which should be implement...
- February 22nd, 2014, 9:05 am
- Forum: Software Support
- Topic: Missing features in VersaTuner
- Replies: 27
- Views: 44871
Re: Missing features in VersaTuner
Great would be a (optional) AFR-view for all fuel tables, so that you can see and enter values in air fuel ratio format (which is much more common) without having to transform first via dividing/multiplying by 14.7!
- February 13th, 2014, 6:36 am
- Forum: Software Support
- Topic: Missing features in VersaTuner
- Replies: 27
- Views: 44871
Re: Missing features in VersaTuner
It would also be nice if the max allowed input value for the VVT table was at least 35 instead of just 30...
- December 18th, 2013, 6:50 am
- Forum: Software Support
- Topic: Missing features in VersaTuner
- Replies: 27
- Views: 44871
Missing features in VersaTuner
Hi, here's my personal overview of missing features / functionalities which could or should be improved or extended (I already posted this "wish list" on MSF) - would be great if at least some of these proposals were considered for the development of the next VT release! - possibility to c...