Page 1 of 2

Reworked k4 dyno results

Posted: February 15th, 2012, 4:40 pm
by boloteo
Hello,
I have finnaly found some time to make some dyno test to my car.
The results of it is :

Re: Reworked k4 dyno results

Posted: February 15th, 2012, 4:48 pm
by boloteo
My car mods are :

cp-e cai - cp-e fmic- cp-e upgraded fuel pump - 3 inch custom downpipe (decut) -2.75 inch custom exhaust - k1 rods -wiseco pistons - reworked k4 -devils own meth system.

The car is running 26 psi overboost and holds untill redline 20 psi (with greddy profec b boost controller).

All these mods are under a custom tune ,with Versatune..........

Re: Reworked k4 dyno results

Posted: February 16th, 2012, 1:05 pm
by skiptownmcat
I take it that's whp? Are you using a 3bar map sensor?

Re: Reworked k4 dyno results

Posted: February 16th, 2012, 4:34 pm
by boloteo
skiptownmcat wrote:I take it that's whp? Are you using a 3bar map sensor?
Yes it is whp, no i don`t use a 3bar sensor(i still have the stock)

Re: Reworked k4 dyno results

Posted: February 16th, 2012, 4:42 pm
by mituc
The stock MAP sensor reads up to 1.5BAR/22PSI (21.75). How is this problem addressed actually?

Re: Reworked k4 dyno results

Posted: February 17th, 2012, 4:31 am
by boloteo
mituc wrote:The stock MAP sensor reads up to 1.5BAR/22PSI (21.75). How is this problem addressed actually?
Stock ecu operates in close loop lamda all the time. So map reading is not a problem

Re: Reworked k4 dyno results

Posted: February 17th, 2012, 7:56 am
by skiptownmcat
Are you saying you're in closed loop the time?

Re: Reworked k4 dyno results

Posted: February 17th, 2012, 12:14 pm
by Steve @ VersaTune
The MAP sensor is really only used for overboost protection. All of the tuning tables are based on load which is derived from the MAF input.

Re: Reworked k4 dyno results

Posted: February 17th, 2012, 2:25 pm
by skiptownmcat
Ah, I see. You set the overboost limits above the range of the map sensor but leave the load limits in place?

Re: Reworked k4 dyno results

Posted: February 17th, 2012, 2:41 pm
by mituc
Looks like so, and since the load is calculated based on the MAF g/s readings (which is still reading consistent data) everything else simply makes sense.

OP, how do your per gear requested load tables look like? I'm just curious.