Ignition tables

[mrQQ]

did you actually feel the difference in part throttle? that's the part i'm very interested in.

[mrQQ]

also, in 1.5 there were OL/CL transition tables, which are gone in 1.6. Why/

[Steve @ VersaTune]

The same tables exist. The table names were just changed as a result of a better understanding of their function..

[mrQQ]

are these the "Abnormal" tables?

also, what is the respective table names in Cobb AP, if you know? I want to try some of their tables, but ignition table names seem to be completely different.

[Sassimac]

did you actually feel the difference in part throttle? that's the part i'm very interested in.

Yes, I very much feel the difference. The car has a very light throttle now, with heaps of pickup.

You will need to log load and rpm so you know where to add advance.

[skiptownmcat]

Made some changes today, 1.5 to the normal and 5 to the max tables in the 1.5-4.5k and .375-1.375 loads. Initial reports are good, the car feels a bit more eager at cruise, mpg appears to have gone up by 2 but I'll wait for a few days until I've done a lot of town driving as well before I'll know for sure. My pt KR seems to be happening less as well, that may just be a placebo though.

[Sassimac]

Hello All...

Please find attached a spreadsheet which outlines the timing changes I made.

Hope it helps.

http://www.fuzzy-puppy.com/files/VT-114%20Tables.zip

[Steve @ VersaTune]

Keep an eye on KR, and be sure to monitor again in hot weather.

[mrQQ]

Steve, can you comment on the table names please?

[mituc]

The closed loop timing tables look good, you have significant changes in the rev range where it really matters. If you don't have any crazy KR there then it's fine.

I noticed that you're using significantly less timing in open loop without having the per gear load limits significantly changed. So with the boost just slightly increased I can't find a good explanation for those significantly lower timing advance values.